2theadvocate.com | News | Procedure crafted for handling evolution-materials complaints — Baton Rouge, LA
Baton Rouge Temperature: 47°
Political News: Landrieu to support Senate health care bill debate
Saturday, November 21, 2009

NEWS

Procedure crafted for handling evolution-materials complaints

Among those testifying before the state’s top school board were, from left, John W. Oller Jr., a professor at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette; retired East Baton Rouge City Court Judge Darrell White and Lennie Ditoro of Mandeville. Gene Mills, right, executive director of the Louisiana Family Forum Action, did not testify but said in an interview that he backs rules that a committee of the board approved for science classes in public schools.
Show Caption TRAVIS SPRADLING/THE ADVOCATE
  • By WILL SENTELL
  • Advocate Capitol News Bureau
  • Published: Sep 17, 2009 - Page: 1A

The state’s top school board Wednesday approved procedures for residents who object to materials that challenge the teaching of evolution in public school science classes.

The rules, which were praised by evolution critics, stem from a law approved last year by the Legislature.

Backers say the law is needed to give science teachers more freedom to challenge traditional theories, including Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution.

Critics contend the measure, called the Louisiana Science Education Act, is aimed at injecting religious themes into public schools.

The statute allows science teachers to use supplemental materials, in addition to state-issued textbooks, to teach evolution and other topics.

“What’s left hanging are the procedures when a complaint is raised,” said Scott Norton, assistant state superintendent for student and school performance.

The department recommended that any complaints undergo an initial review by a three-member panel named by the agency, then go to the state board for a final decision.

But Dale Bayard, of Sulphur, chairman of the committee that tackled the issue, changed that and the committee went along.

Under Bayard’s change, two reviewers will be named by the department to review the science materials in question as well as one reviewer each named by the challenger, the school and the publisher.

The five-member panel will determine whether the materials:

  • Promote any religious doctrine, which is banned by the state law.
  • Are scientifically sound.
  • Are appropriate for the grade.

Bayard’s committee approved the complaint process without arguments.

Since other board members were there too, committee approval on Wednesday is tantamount to endorsement by the full state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education,  which is expected today.


    Most Popular     Most Emailed     Hot Topics    
ADVERTISEMENTS








PROMOTIONS


 
Envelope icon Have a question, comment, news tip or story idea? Click here to give us some feedback.