SEARCH:    GO    2theadvocate    Classifieds    Advocate Archives
Wednesday, May 14, 2008

NEWS

Tax break vote set

Lawmakers cite need to relieve taxpayers
  • By MICHELLE MILLHOLLON
  • Advocate Capitol News Bureau
  • Published: May 9, 2008 - Page: 1A - UPDATED: 12:10 a.m.

Lawmakers delayed a decision Thursday night on legislation that would eventually eliminate the state income tax.

However, legislators said they cannot emerge from the session without some type of relief for taxpayers, especially if it comes down to reining in the growth of state government to make it affordable.

“It almost puts the gun to the head of the members of the Legislature and the administration to do something about spending,” said state Rep. Hunter Greene, R-Baton Rouge, chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means.
The panel is scheduled to vote on the tax break Monday.

The question is what kind of tax relief will emerge and whether Gov. Bobby Jindal will embrace it.

State Sen. Buddy Shaw, R-Shreveport, drafted Senate Bill 87 as a $302 million tax break that would revise some of the income tax brackets the Stelly plan changed.

The Stelly plan, named for the legislator who drew up the measure, phased out state sales taxes on necessities while increasing income taxes for some wage earners.

Stelly divided wage earners into three tax brackets.

For individual filers, those brackets are:

  • Income up to $12,500 is taxed at 2 percent.
  • Income between $12,500 and $25,000 is taxed at 4 percent.
  • Income over $25,000 is taxed at 6 percent.
The thresholds are doubled for joint filers.

SB87 would tax individuals who make between $12,500 and $50,000 at 4 percent.

Shaw told the Ways and Means panel that he wants to help the middle class.

The state would recoup some of the money in sales tax as people buy an extra tank of gas and make other purchases with their savings, he said.

The Senate, Shaw said, played a game that got out of hand by adding an amendment that would wipe out the state income tax.

Income tax obligations would diminish by 10 percent a year, disappearing entirely by 2017 at a cost to state coffers of $4 billion.


Comments (2)
Sue
Friday, May 09, 2008
7:59 AM

I'm all for getting rid of state income tax. When you hear every year, at least in the recent past, there's a substantial state surplus and you watch the legislature try and garner a piece of it for their special projects, how much of that surplus is because of the taxpayers? As oil/gas continues to go up, as does food, clothing, utilities, car/health insurances, etc. the average taxpayer is barely making ends meet right now, if at all. Isn't it past time the Legislature and Governor started looking at giving what the taxpayers paid in part that creates this surplus every year, back to the taxpayer?
Bo
Friday, May 09, 2008
8:58 AM

Sue- Your talking out of your head now with logic like that. Don't you know it is all their money they just allow us to keep a little bit out of the kindness of their hearts. They know better what to do with our money then we ever will. How do you think we came to be ranked last on most lists, luck, hardly it took lots of dedicated incompetence by our politicians to get us there. Funny how they need "immediate action regarding ethics law weakening," but they are not so quick to act doing away with taxes for all of us.
ADVERTISEMENTS
McDonald's
PROMOTIONS


Dish Network

2theadvocate.com Ticket Giveaway - Alicia Keys



WBRZ CHANNEL 2


 
Envelope icon Have a question, comment, news tip or story idea? Click here to give us some feedback.