SEARCH:    GO    2theadvocate    Classifieds    Advocate Archives
Friday, May 16, 2008

NEWS

Cazayoux touts health plan

  • By SARAH CHACKO
  • Advocate Capitol news bureau
  • Published: Apr 27, 2008 - UPDATED: 12:05 a.m.

If not for the blue-and-yellow signs covering the front of the small Main Street office, it would be hard to guess that inside are the workings of a congressional campaign.

“You can see that this is a working headquarters,” said 6th Congressional District Democratic candidate Don Cazayoux, seated on an old couch behind the front window as staff and volunteers work the phones a few feet away. “It’s certainly not for show.”

The office — with a giant handmade calendar stretched across the wall, stakes for yard signs piled in a corner and small tables set up along the walls for phone calls — is a clear example of the “retail politics” all the candidates are undertaking in this election.

Cazayoux, Republican candidate Woody Jenkins and three candidates outside of the major parties — Peter Aranyosi, Ashley Casey and Randall Hayes — will be on the ballot for the May 3 general election.

Under a congressional election format new to many Louisiana voters, the candidate with the most votes — even if the total is less than 50 percent — will win outright.

Cazayoux’s campaign manager, Katie Nee, said she is keeping the campaign focused on the candidate’s message, choosing a network of people over a slew of signs. 

Asking friends to invite friends for house parties and throwing themed volunteer nights at the headquarters, the campaign is building its own events to get Cazayoux face time with interested and informed voters, she said.

“If you can talk directly with a voter, person to person, I think that’s the most effective way,” said Cazayoux, a state representative from New Roads. “Now, it’s not the most efficient way, but I think it’s the most effective way.”

Cazayoux, 44, said his personal, pro bono work as a small-town lawyer in New Roads led him to politics.

“A lot of time it was helping people through the bureaucratic maze of government and just organizations that are bigger than them,” he said. “It was, to me, a natural progression to go in a legislative direction.”

Cazayoux’s father is a small-business owner in New Roads, and his mother is a retired teacher. Cazayoux graduated from Catholic of Pointe Coupee, going on to earn psychology degrees from LSU and a law degree from Georgetown Law School in Washington D.C. He and his wife Cherie have been married for 21 years and have three children.

Cazayoux said he focused his eight-year legislative career on issues he believed would make a difference in society, including early childhood education, Internet sex crimes and ethics.

Cazayoux said he tested the ethics reform waters with financial disclosure bills before Gov. Bobby Jindal introduced his own ethics package this year.


Comments (4)
jeffsadow
Sunday, Apr 27, 2008
8:43 AM

>Cazayoux said he tested the ethics reform waters with financial disclosure bills before Gov. Bobby Jindal introduced his own ethics package this year. And he also, in 2006, voted against SB 382 which would have banned free sporting and cultural tickets to legislators. Now, in 2008, he votes for the ban. What changed in two years? Did that suddenly become an ethics problem to him when it hadn't been? Why? Or maybe it's because two years ago he wasn't running for Congress and didn't need to appear as something he is not. Naw, couldn't be ....
YellowDog
Sunday, Apr 27, 2008
1:25 PM

Riddle me this, professor: Was he running for Congress last year when he, Mr. Jackson, and Mr. Lafleur cosponsored HB 730 which would have required income disclosure for elected officials? NO, he wasn't. And you are factually inaccurate when you say that Don voted against SB 382 in 2006. He made two votes on the bill, but neither of those votes were votes against passage. They were merely procedural votes. He voted against giving additional time for debate on the bill (which had probably already been debated ad naseum) and voted against indefinitely postponing a final passage vote. And voting against indefinite postponement can be seen as a vote FOR the bill, since voting for indefinite postponement is essentially a vote for killing the bill. So nice try, professor, but I think that you may have taken an errant swing at the pinata of vote distortion.
reagan
Sunday, Apr 27, 2008
1:28 PM

Cazayoux; an ethics reformer? Is that why he voted to allow casinos to continue the practice of employing elected officials? Is that why he voted for the expansion of gambling? Cazayoux is a typical politician, talking out of both sides of his mouth. He tells us his campaign is about the kitchen table issues and then he goes on WJBO and they ask him what the price of milk is and he doesn't have a clue. You ought to know the price of milk before you go trying to sell us socialized medicine.
Dr. Owen Scott, III
Monday, Apr 28, 2008
11:54 PM

Sure, Don Cazayoux is a politician. He's also a moderate who is respectful of his colleagues and can work to build a consensus. Persons who serve in legislatures for a long time end up with many votes that can be used to spin their record to the left or to the right. The issues about Don Cazayoux boil down to whether you prefer him to Woody Jenkins. The attacks on Cazayoux are coming from the far right. Don is not an ideologue like Jenkins- he's a moderate and a pragmatist with good values. If you like the war in Iraq, wildly non-conservative spending policies to promote international intervention with disastrous results, lack of action on health care for the uninsured, and intolerance of diversity, vote for Woody. Otherwise, you might want to consider a centrist who can work with people on both sides of the aisle to achieve results and will not engage in partisan warfare.
ADVERTISEMENTS
McDonald's


PROMOTIONS


Dish Network

WBRZ CHANNEL 2


 
Envelope icon Have a question, comment, news tip or story idea? Click here to give us some feedback.